Lynne Parker

Lynne Parker

The Morality of Comedy

I recently appeared on BBC Radio 4’s flagship programme, The Moral Maze with presenter Michael Buerk discussing the Morality of Comedy.  This was a very challenging exercise as it’s been a long time since I took part in the school debating society!

Pah, I hear you say – you work in comedy, don’t you?  Yes, and I am more usually found coaching other people to confront an audience to make them laugh or encouraging them argue a point. That said, I followed my own advice and prepared rather thoroughly for the programme by asking myself some questions on the topic and arguing back my point.

Of course, during the seven or eight minutes I was on air in the ‘witness stand’ a lot of my well-planned points went out the window.  Overall it was a great experience to be on a programme that I love and respect.  Thanks for those of you who heard it and sent me messages of support.

If you missed it, the programme is still available to download here and here are some of the answers I prepared earlier!   

Q. Should comedy reinforce or challenge the moral consensus of its audience?

Absolutely comedy should challenge the moral consensus.  Every culture has its preferred channels for humour and this is a vital form of communication within our communities.  This varies relative to language, climate, landscape, war, peace and politics as well as entertainment.  All are open to humorous interpretation and we laugh at things that are familiar to us, make us feel acknowledged, understood and safe. When we laugh together, we share something and this can be very powerful in terms of building teams in a business environment or engaging followers in a leadership contest.

Q. When is mockery offensive and when is it satire?

The lines are continually blurring and moving.  In my opinion, satire is supposed to be a ‘friendly’ way of sending somebody up, calling them to account or making light of serious issues.  Yet satire is all in the eyes of the beholder when it comes to being ‘offensive’.  Comedy Roasts are considered cruel but people are happy to expose themselves to such eye-watering scrutiny. Taking into account Donald Trump’s Roast in 2011 pre-presidency and we could argue that if he can get through that experience, then he was well prepared to ride the storm of a video involving a little bit of ‘pussy’.  Is that offensive?  Who was offended here?  Who knew?

I’ve seen a real change in attitudes around language.  15 years ago when I created Funny Women, you couldn’t easily say ‘vagina’ – now it’s a comedy staple but there are still people who take offence to biological terms.

Q. Are comedians as important as pundits or politicians to the health of democracy? Or has comedy dumbed down debate and trivialised issues we should all be taking seriously?

It’s hard to tell comedians and politicians apart anyway!  We remember somebody who is funny and clever politicians know how and when to get a laugh.  Which is why some politicians employ comedians to help them with speeches – they know the tactics of comedy.  Look at Jacob Rees Mogg and Boris Johnson who constantly lay themselves open to ridicule to make themselves more ‘likeable’.

All through history reigning monarchs and leaders have employed ‘fools’ to illustrate the social positioning of their kingdoms. Modern day satire, whether that be in the media or on the live comedy circuit, provides the same function and this is continually played out as an important part of today’s political arena.  It doesn’t pay to take yourself too seriously.

Satire is exactly a combination of this – disarming your audience with what might be perceived as a ‘cheap laugh’ leaves them more open to the point you are really trying to make.

Q. Was Moliere right when he said that the function of comedy is ‘to correct men’s vices’? Or should we just stick a cucumber through next door’s letter box and tell them the Martians have landed?

Comedy takes many different forms and surrealism has a part to play. By questioning the ridiculous to the sublime we are opening up our creativity out of which may evolve a solution.  Art has taken that course and been the focus of much debate – inexplicable comedy can fulfil a similar function even if it’s just to get somebody to laugh at a silly simplistic idea or a rude word.

What may appear as a simple ‘joke’ is often placed as a question and art and literature are peppered with this.  The Greek philosophers knew this and it has been played out through history from Chaucer to Shakespeare to Dickens.  All are explored from our reaction to a literary ‘prat fall’ or the slip-on-a-banana-skin.

Here are a further five points that I addressed:


We use our creativity to change culture, hence ‘cultural engineering’. The use of humour is an important cultural conduit via which we can communicate on many levels, prevalent in literature from Chaucer, through to Shakespeare and Dickens; in politics through newspaper sketch writing and cartoons to Spitting Image and The Thick of It and even the way we bring up and educate the next generation – for instance, everybody remembers the ‘funny’ teacher. Comedy is holding up a mirror to society and the use of humour is a way of exposing the best or the worst of ‘being human’ (or not as the case may be).


Comedy or using humour is a vital part of our humanity. It’s instinctive and everybody has the ability to ‘be funny’ or make other people laugh, intentionally or not.

At its simplest level we make people laugh to communicate effectively and improve wellbeing, for example we tickle children to make them laugh when they are feeling sad – the recently deceased Ken Dodd (whose death prompted the subject matter of this episode of The Moral Maze) employed a very obvious version of this – he tickled his audience with well-crafted and innocent comedy.

Doddy’s ‘Tickling Stick’ is emblematic. What may appear ‘trivial’ and lightweight appeals to us at the most basic human level – the urge and experience of communal laughing is a true expression of our humanity. A good comedian understands the trigger points and can combine something base or puerile with something laden with meaning to make a more serious point.


Women have always been there and are hugely influential from Joyce Grenfell, Lucille Ball and Mary Tyler Moore in the 1950s and 1960’s who wrote and produced their own material to Wood & Walters, French & Saunders, and in the alternative 80s, to today’s Miranda Hart, Sarah Millican, Katherine Ryan and many more.

Women’s humour is essential to communities and goes under the radar because it is internalized and ‘circular’ in nature having a key role in the upbringing and education of future generations and sustaining the elders. It’s my belief women use their ‘sense of humour’ to bond, reassure and instil a sense of wellbeing within families and communities.


Men use humour to display strength power and leadership. A man can laugh a woman into his bed and research shows that a ‘GSOH’ comes highest in the list of attributes women look for in a male partner.

In the wild, female mammals demonstrate their submission to a male by showing their neck, a vulnerable part of the body.  When we laugh we throw our heads back revealing our necks in a throwback to our less evolved animal heritage. Getting a ‘cheap laugh’ takes on a whole new meaning in the mating game!


There’s a lot of training talk around ‘thought leadership’ and comedians can be considered in this context as they can bend public opinion and raise issues with their material, particularly if they have a strong following.

Laughter increases endorphins, happy hormones, which are released in responses to pain, stress, shock, surprise, excitement, consumption of spicy food and orgasm!  This results in a relaxed state when we become more open to the possibilities and the rhetoric being presented to us. No wonder satire is so powerful.

Laughter also increases your production of serotonin, the brain chemical that keeps your neural pathways working effectively.  In the ‘fight or flight’ model, a good leader might use a funny story or joke to relax his followers and spike their serotonin production to give them clarity for the task ahead or to be more open to his or her instructions. Good leaders also know that if they can make their followers laugh at something they have in common, this has a valuable and unifying effect and makes the group more open to achieving the tasks being imposed.

All this and more!  I regularly talk about such stuff and run workshops for companies and organisations exploring how we can use humour in the workplace to build confidence, improve communications and encourage teams and groups to work together more harmoniously.  Please visit or email for more details. 

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

You might also like

From the Funny Women Team

Gift Guide for your Comedy Fan Friend

year again, the season of giving is almost upon us and if you have a comedy fan on your Secret Santa list, or just want to subtly share this link around your friends and family, we have put together this list of gifts anyone who likes a laugh and supporting women will love…

Read More »

It’s Britney Bitch, the Q&A

Writers and performers Charly Clive and Ellen Robertson’s hit live show Britney which tells the true story of enduring friendship amidst a brain tumour (called Britney) diagnosis has now been made into a BBC Three show starring Charly, Ellen, Omid Djalili, Tony Gardner and Lia Williams.

Read More »

Why We Protest

Protest. It’s one of the first things we do. That cry all newborns make when they’re born? That’s them protesting being pulled from the lovely warm womb and out into this cruel harsh world. In fairness, I’d be livid too; I hear it’s nice in there. We’re born protesting and I think it’s one of the things that makes us human. 

Read More »

The Guide: December

AS IF the year is nearly over. If I were to give the year marks out of ten, I would be on the receiving end of an angry phone call from the year’s mother because the year had come home from school crying, and I would tell the year’s mother that she can’t shout me into a giving the year a better grade, because I’m a good teacher actually but there’s only so much you can do when your child is hellbent on being this much of an asshole. Does that make sense?

Read More »